Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:49:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Jim Capozzoli <saltmiser@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. Message-ID: <20070615214849.F63508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> <20070615183413.GA9693@rot13.obsecurity.org> <37f72b1f0706151225s53c8c2f1k17d00c9c6f96004d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> UFS and future derivatives are here to stay. >> > Yeah, but you know because of how nice ZFS is, a concept of using ZFS > for /home and UFS for everything else will probably turn into a if ZFS will really be so nice i will be making small (50MB) partition for /boot files, ZFS on rest.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070615214849.F63508>