Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 26 Nov 2012 07:05:37 -0800
From:      Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>
To:        Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@bluezbox.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Hackers <hackers@freebsd.org>, Alexander Yerenkow <yerenkow@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD on RaspberryPi
Message-ID:  <1E75CEAC-32E8-4048-A1FB-DD59F996E22F@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <C706651B-ABBE-4CEC-96D9-A5214BFEC11D@bluezbox.com>
References:  <31C904E6-F230-4187-AE32-F9A7B1A7C38E@freebsd.org> <CAPJF9w=-pgVsz3JkKcwq7ZRYUNKUdFdEvU0fZZzZrVxTRpLW3w@mail.gmail.com> <4A5E03E5-3295-4FD4-9A06-7D1C4E9E0C12@freebsd.org> <CAPJF9wk%2B_5F4PAu8bK6A=Lfup6Qi_5OUJOqWfcJRKLJmeGSqGg@mail.gmail.com> <B11C8BD8-1F6B-4300-9BC9-77CD81F9670E@freebsd.org> <CAPJF9wnk6qqAA3F69CokRrHOsAotbUDtQPOiZ=EuhO7ZfM2y0Q@mail.gmail.com> <EFED5426-7DF7-41DA-82B1-6FEAB21EA098@freebsd.org> <9E4DA920-BE72-4AA0-8159-43205CDEF5CD@bluezbox.com> <EBE2570F-E57F-42F7-A7A5-5291E8CD81F1@freebsd.org> <C706651B-ABBE-4CEC-96D9-A5214BFEC11D@bluezbox.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Nov 25, 2012, at 11:46 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:

>=20
> On 2012-11-25, at 9:32 AM, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Nov 24, 2012, at 8:01 PM, Oleksandr Tymoshenko wrote:
>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On 2012-11-24, at 4:47 PM, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>>=20
>=20
> .. skipped ..
>=20
>>> Tim,
>>>=20
>>> I'm almost done with getting kernel working with latest raspberry Pi =
firmware. Just need
>>> to figure out how to make ubldr pass FDT pointer from u-boot to =
kernel and handle=20
>>> /reserve/ information in ARM machdep code.=20
>>=20
>> Let me know if you need help with this.  I've worked with
>> the ubldr FDT code recently.
>>=20
>>> Meanwhile I suggest editing .dts file manually. Fill out "display" =
node properties with proper
>>> display resolution and depth. Also add ukbd driver. That should get =
you working console.
>>=20
>> I'll try that.
>>=20
>> I'm curious:  why is this information coming from the DTS?
>> That seems pretty complex; I thought that the
>> console code would query this information via the mailbox
>> interface.
>=20
>=20
> It's either FDT blob or message box interface. Implementation =
complexity is about the same.

My thinking:
  * Display resolution used by kernel has to match what the firmware =
uses.  So the kernel should either get the information from the firmware =
or from the same place the firmware gets it from.
  * We want ubldr to remain generic, so I'm reluctant to put things into =
it that are RaspberryPi-specific.

If the firmware is putting the values into the FDT, then having the =
kernel get it from the FDT is another way for the kernel to get it from =
the firmware, so that sounds okay.


> But since we're getting other variables (like MAC address, memory =
size) from FDT I decided
> to be consistent and get all of them from there.

I don't know about MAC address.  Memory size is handled generically by =
ubldr using a standard interface to U-Boot, so it's not special to =
RaspberryPi.  The FDT editing is just a standard way for ubldr to pass =
this to the kernel.

> The issue I'm facing is that ubldr gets FDT blob
> either from file directly or from ELF kernel itself. While on =
Raspberry Pi to works as follows:
>=20
> - Firmware loads .dtb file from SD card to specified address

Does RaspberryPi firmware now load an FDT?

Does the firmware now read the FDT to get its values for display =
resolution, etc?
(I don't really like this because a lot of people need to tweak the =
display settings and it's hard to tell a 6-year-old how to edit and =
recompile an FDT.)

> - Fixes up values like amount of memory, reserved regions, UART and =
clock frequencies,=20
>   MAC address, display resolution.
> - Passes control to next link in boot chain (e.g. U-Boot)

To be clear:  You say the RPi firmware is already doing this editing?

So the ubldr just has to pass the RPi FDT to the kernel?  If so, that's =
a lot simpler.

> I'm thinking about adding compile-time constant FDT_BLOB_ADDRESS and =
arrange possible
> FDT sources in following priority:
>=20
> - Check FDT_BLOB_ADDRESS (if defined)
> - Check dtb file
> - Check ELF kernel
>=20
> Does it sound sane enough?=20

If the RPi firmware always loads the FDT at a fixed address
and the RPi firmware is using the FDT to configure itself,
then it makes a lot of sense.

It would be nice to do this without adding RPi-specific
code to ubldr.

> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to =
"freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1E75CEAC-32E8-4048-A1FB-DD59F996E22F>