Date: Wed, 10 Sep 1997 23:31:02 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Pedro Giffuni S," <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Cc: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Major bogon in tcp_wrappers port. Message-ID: <199709102131.XAA01518@greenpeace.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Pedro Giffuni S," wrote: > > And ... which inetd related server programs do we want to > > protect, only some or all ? > > > IMO the only service that MUST have this control is SMTP (I run it in > inetd). I usually restrict access to the mailer from unknown hosts, > which is also a sane measure against spammers. Sendmail has the ability to use libwrap directly. (No /etc/inetd.conf involvement, so it is fast). SSH is the same. Other resident daemons can be converted with ease. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709102131.XAA01518>