From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 01:46:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218AF16A407 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from calais.chapman.edu (calais.chapman.edu [192.77.116.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448DC44111 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:39:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chandler@chapman.edu) Received: from [206.211.142.181] (ist181.chapman.edu [206.211.142.181]) by calais.chapman.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3CC2E5BF; Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:40:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4581FD29.6040807@chapman.edu> Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 17:40:57 -0800 From: Jay Chandler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <20061214101951.269c6303.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <4581CEFC.2010801@chapman.edu> <20061214202800.c6b60843.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> In-Reply-To: <20061214202800.c6b60843.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chapman-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Chapman-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Chapman-MailScanner-From: chandler@chapman.edu X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell 2950 & 1950 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 01:46:04 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > We get all our units with Dell's remote access card installed. It > gives us the same kind of remote admin -- equivalent to being able to > hit the power button from the other side of the planet. > Some of our servers have it, some of them don't-- I've been here four months, and wasn't involved in prior purchases. If I had my druthers, we'd be on HP servers instead (I'd also probably be able to get a good price on Ebay for "druthers," but I digress), or IBM, or one of several other more expensive options, but for now I'm playing the hand I was dealt, serverwise. On the plus side, they're all starting out with a comfortable 4 gigs of RAM. >> What advantages/disadvantages do you see with running the 64 bit >> architecture? I must confess, it never occured to me to try that... >> I'm running the Dual Core Xeon processors, if that helps anything. >> > > In our case, we're primarily concerned about RAM. These units are starting > out with 4G, and we're monitoring them so we can add RAM when the usage > goes up. amd64 is obviously going to be better supported going forward > than PAE. > Right, PAE is sort of a blast from the past, and I'd much sooner go to a new server than screw around with the 4gb limit personally. Is there any more work to maintaining an amd64 install than "grab a different ISO when it's time to install the box?" Also, will it work on the Xeon dual core? I've always been comfortably removed from the hardware level, and my new responsibilities aren't quite familiar to me yet... -- Jay Chandler Network Administrator, Chapman University 714.628.7249 / chandler@chapman.edu Today's Excuse: Processes running slowly due to weak power supply