From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 16:54:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFA916A4CE for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:54:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB5A43D1D for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:54:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from brillig.panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A40158B1D for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:54:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01011983pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.182.142]) by brillig.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51442AA10 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:54:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CX0PB-00028V-00 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:54:09 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 11:54:09 -0500 From: stan To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20041124165409.GA8187@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23 X-Uptime: 11:50:53 up 23 days, 14:38, 1 user, load average: 0.26, 0.11, 0.03 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown Subject: Perl Proc::Processtable module and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 16:54:11 -0000 I planed on writing a perl script on my FreeBSD laptop over the holidays, that would ultimetly be deployed on Solaris. I was planing on using the Proc::ProcessTable perl module in this script to collect memory usage data. Looks like this module does nt support memory statistics under FreeBSD, even though ps ddoes. Is there a better module to se, or should I just resort to useing a direct call to ps (which will of course be different on the 2 OS'es? -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin