From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 7 14:50:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C1216A425 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:50:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FBD43D7B for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:50:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jB7Eo7BY008278 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:50:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id jB7Eo7su008277; Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:50:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 14:50:07 GMT Message-Id: <200512071450.jB7Eo7su008277@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org From: deskpot@dot.aerodome.ru (Vasily Korytov) Cc: Subject: Re: conf/89789: [patch] 500.ipfwdenied uses deprecated syntax of ipfw X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vasily Korytov List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:50:21 -0000 The following reply was made to PR conf/89789; it has been noted by GNATS. From: deskpot@dot.aerodome.ru (Vasily Korytov) To: Oleg Bulyzhin Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: conf/89789: [patch] 500.ipfwdenied uses deprecated syntax of ipfw Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:40:12 +0300 On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 21:01:05 GMT, Oleg Bulyzhin wrote: > What is CVS id of your /etc/periodic/security/500.ipfwdenied file? 1.5 > The issue you are talking about was fixed in rev 1.6 almost year ago. > It looks like your system was partially upgraded to RELENG_6_0 (did > you ever run mergemaster?). Oops, indeed I did run it -- but only with -p option. Running it without this option helped. Thanks. =) -- Oops! I sent it again.