From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 2 06:46:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6DD16A41F for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 06:46:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deb@xcon.it) Received: from elettra.xcon.it (ip-26-2.sn1.eutelia.it [62.94.26.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E131C43D45 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 06:46:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deb@xcon.it) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elettra.xcon.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DC01F989 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:46:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from elettra.xcon.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (elettra [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13746-01-2 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:46:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (ip-139-12.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.139.12]) by elettra.xcon.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id E781C1F980 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:46:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4317F550.5090408@xcon.it> Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 08:46:40 +0200 From: Simone Martelli Organization: [X]con User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050725) X-Accept-Language: it, it-it, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2792860b05090114194d4df30a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2792860b05090114194d4df30a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at xcon.it Subject: Re: and the winner is... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 06:46:57 -0000 Mario Carugno ha scritto: > I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against > debian/linux. > The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not > faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. > Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt > system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... > X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't > works... > I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. Maybe do you like the flame but this is really bad place for it. Enjoy what you like. Simone