From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 2 05:16:36 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id FAA13847 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 2 Oct 1995 05:16:36 -0700 Received: from Relay1.Austria.EU.net (relay1.Austria.EU.net [192.92.138.47]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA13828 for ; Mon, 2 Oct 1995 05:16:32 -0700 From: marino.ladavac@aut.alcatel.at Received: from aut.alcatel.at (dnisun.aut.alcatel.at) by Relay1.Austria.EU.net with SMTP id AA26594 (5.67b/IDA-1.5 for ); Mon, 2 Oct 1995 13:16:08 +0100 Received: from atuhc16 by aut.alcatel.at (4.1/SMI-4.1/AAA-1.29/main) id AA13898; Mon, 2 Oct 95 13:12:21 +0100 Message-Id: <9510021212.AA13898@atuhc16.aut.alcatel.at> Received: by atuhc16 (1.38.193.4/16.2) id AA16267; Mon, 2 Oct 1995 13:16:55 +0100 Subject: Re: Low end PS laser, or inkjet/bubblejet To: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov (Sean Kelly) (Sean Kelly) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 95 13:16:54 MET Cc: hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9510011427.AA26121@emu.fsl.noaa.gov>; from "Sean Kelly" at Oct 1, 95 8:27 am Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > So the card must recognize two different printer names in order to do > two different kinds of processing ... hmmmm. Thanks for posting that! No. The difference is really that one uses text protocol (rp=text), and the other raw protocol (rp=raw). That's the way I understand the rp print capability. In any case, the printer (card) does never see the name (which is local to the machine running lpr/lpd) /Alby (hope I didn't spew too much BS in my reply :) > -- > Sean Kelly > NOAA Forecast Systems Laboratory, Boulder Colorado USA > If you're a young Mafia gangster out on your first date, I bet it's > real embarrassing if someone tries to kill you. -- Jack Handey