From owner-freebsd-alpha Thu Sep 14 19:18:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72A437B422 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zeppo.feral.com (IDENT:mjacob@zeppo [192.67.166.71]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA26989; Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:17:56 -0700 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 19:17:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Peter Wemm Cc: alpha@freebsd.org Subject: PRE_SMPNG question.... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If I want to make sure that PC164's boot and run in the source tree that was tagged PRE_SMPNG, is it acceptable to MFC, as it were, the fix? I've had to, hah hah (coz I wasn't as careful as I should) spend most of the day reinstalling 4.1 so I could get back to having some stable disks I can actually boot from prior to moving ahead back into -current for alpha. It strikes me that having the PRE_SMPNG stuff be stable would be good. But I'll admit that I'm a bit hazy as to how branches work vs. tags. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message