From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Apr 5 15:49:22 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E885BD349 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from smtp.email-protect.gosecure.net (smtp.email-protect.gosecure.net [208.80.202.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.email-protect.gosecure.net", Issuer "Thawte RSA CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FDZpT1dChz4l09 for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from envoy14.neonova.net ([137.118.58.100]) by smtp.email-protect.gosecure.net ({a8225a60-78ba-11eb-bd0b-6d4813cc113d}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20210405154913499_00002496 for ; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 08:49:13 -0700 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from bay.localnet (unknown [199.58.99.76]) (Authenticated sender: carlj@peak.org) by envoy14.neonova.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4FDZpF5D78z9sxX for ; Mon, 5 Apr 2021 11:49:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from carlj by bay.localnet with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1lTRTQ-0004Kp-ED for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 08:49:08 -0700 From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bizarre dependency on gnatcross-sysroot-aarch64? References: <064801d7208a$91844760$b48cd620$@watt.com> <8005b6a88e993756821d85593bfab598@webmail.watt.com> Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 08:49:08 -0700 In-Reply-To: <8005b6a88e993756821d85593bfab598@webmail.watt.com> (Steve Watt's message of "Sun, 04 Apr 2021 20:15:34 -0700") Message-ID: <86tuokspe3.fsf@bay.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-MAG-OUTBOUND: greymail.email-protect.gosecure.net@137.118.58.100/32 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FDZpT1dChz4l09 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=peak.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carlj@peak.org designates 208.80.202.2 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carlj@peak.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.79 / 15.00]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[208.80.202.2:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:208.80.200.0/21]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[208.80.202.2:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[peak.org,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14618, ipnet:208.80.202.0/23, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 15:49:22 -0000 Steve Watt writes: > [ Originally sent to freebsd-pkg, but it appears that nobody really > reads that list... ] > > Greetings! > > I have a puzzle. I've got a 12.2-RELEASE-p4 amd64 system, and pkg > seems to be fixated on installing gnatcross-sysroot-aarch64. I don't > do any Arm development on this system, never have. And certainly not > Ada (because it's one of the few I've never bothered to learn). I have the same problem as you. It doesn't seem to depend on anything and nothing depends on it. I can delete it, but it always comes back the next time I install anything. I have a 12.2-RELEASE-p3 amd64 system and pkg is standard, except that I modified the config file to enable plugins for pkg-provides. I had the same problem before I added pkg-provides, so I don't think that is the cause. I would love to get rid of it, but it isn't worth deleting it every time I add or upgrade a package. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org