From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 12 01:48:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC07106568B for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:48:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EFD8FC1E for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:48:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n9C1mkrO038533; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:48:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n9C1mkg7038532; Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:48:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 18:48:46 -0700 From: Steve Kargl To: Larry Rosenman Message-ID: <20091012014846.GB38325@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <6729ad0409e449f8dbda69ecd8feb618.squirrel@webmail.lerctr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6729ad0409e449f8dbda69ecd8feb618.squirrel@webmail.lerctr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Scheduler weirdness X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:48:48 -0000 On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 05:59:52PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote: > > Ok, running RELENG_8 from Friday (10/9/2009). > > If I have 4 Folding-at-home processes running (they nice themselves) the > system is slow as a dog. > > If I stop them, it's speedy. > > This is running SCHED_ULE > > is this expected? > > What can I do to help? > How many cpus are available on your system? If you're in an over-commit situation with numerical intensive applications, you may find 4BSD to be a better option. -- Steve