Date: Mon, 25 Mar 1996 22:19:09 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu> To: Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= <masafumi@pobox.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, masafumi@pobox.com Subject: Re: about porting (what if pkgname and exec name of depends differ?) Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960325221806.236C-100000@riley-net170-164.uoregon.edu> In-Reply-To: <199603231621.BAA14827@mail.tky007.tth.expo96.ad.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 24 Mar 1996, Masafumi NAKANE/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2Y6LDJtSjgbKEI=?= wrote:
> RUN_DEPENDS= perl5.002:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5
> BUILD_DEPENDS= perl5.002:${PORTSDIR}/lang/perl5
^ Should there be a dash here?
> Configuring and Building processes go well with this setting.
> However, when I run pkg_add or pkg_delete, these programs try to write
> dependency info into /var/db/pkg/perl5.002, where it actually should
> be /var/db/pkg/perl-5.002.
Above is my guess. I haven't used this process so it is a total shot in
the dark, but there is a corellation.
Don't forget you can also check out other programs' Makefiles and see how
they do it :-)
Doug White | University of Oregon
Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960325221806.236C-100000>