Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      28 Sep 2000 11:29:28 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>
Cc:        Siegbert Baude <siegbert.baude@gmx.de>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Pulse poll at Borland
Message-ID:  <xzp3dikrhjb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: Brad Knowles's message of "Thu, 28 Sep 2000 11:15:58 %2B0200"
References:  <3073B3378589D411B21600508BAF32AA012345@EXCHANGE> <39D11CB1.78C07758@gmx.de> <v0422081fb5f6cf08806d@[195.238.1.121]> <xzpk8bygugf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <v04220806b5f76f0c9417@[195.238.1.121]> <xzpsnqlq868.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <v04220806b5f8bcad1e89@[10.0.1.2]>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be> writes:
> At 9:37 AM +0200 2000/9/28, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> >  I'm afraid that's just not true. Go check your facts.
> 	Please name one product that they created entirely in-house, as 
> opposed to buying it from an outside source and then slapping their 
> name on it.

I don't deny this, but you were implying that they never added any
value to the products they acquired, which is not true. I used
TurboPascal from 3.0 to Borland Pasal 7.0, and Borland did an
excellent job with the IDE, the debugger, the libraries etc. even if
they did not originally write the underlying compiler themselves.

I also used their C compilers from TurboC 2.0 to Borland C/C++
4.something, and again, they did a very good job with the IDE, the
debugging tools, the interface design tools etc., though it went
downhill from 4.0 and on.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp3dikrhjb.fsf>