Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Jan 2002 04:11:34 +0300
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_opieaccess pam_opieaccess.c
Message-ID:  <20020125011133.GA89474@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020124200023.67438I-100000@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <20020125005725.GA89369@nagual.pp.ru> <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020124200023.67438I-100000@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 20:03:07 -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> > 
> > To prevent any tricks with resolver it is always better to pass numeric
> > IP address into PAM's RHOST when possible. 
> 
> Will it ever not be possible to pass a numeric IP address?

For network connection, you get IP address first, not DNS name.
I see no much sense to resolve it into DNS name then pass it to PAM where 
modules will resolve it back to IP address. This whole part can be 
skipped to be more secure in case something happens with resolver.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020125011133.GA89474>