From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 31 14:40:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF1231065670 for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuku@kukulies.org) Received: from werkwelt.de (post.werkwelt.de [91.194.85.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557F08FC1E for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuku@kukulies.org) Received: from [87.79.34.228] (account kuku@kukulies.org HELO [192.168.1.114]) by werkwelt.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.13) with ESMTPA id 6452878; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:40:09 +0100 Message-ID: <490B1875.3050408@kukulies.org> Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 15:38:45 +0100 From: Christoph Kukulies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras References: <490AC650.3000904@kukulies.org> <20081031110159.GA30244@icarus.home.lan> <490B17D2.6010000@kukulies.org> In-Reply-To: <490B17D2.6010000@kukulies.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fastest raw device copy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 14:40:10 -0000 Christoph Kukulies schrieb: > Ivan Voras schrieb: >> Jeremy Chadwick wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 09:48:16AM +0100, Christoph Kukulies wrote: >>> >> >> >>>> What would be the fastest way to do that sector by sector copy? >>>> I'm using dd right now, >>>> >>>> dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/da0 bs=10000000 >>>> >> >> >>> On the flip side, your blocksize (bs) there is quite high for no good >>> reason. I'd pick something more like bs=64k or bs=128k. The default >>> (512) is too small for what you want, but 10MBytes is silly. >>> >> >> Not only that, but "10000000" isn't even correct - it needs to be a >> multiple of sector size. Generally, using suffixes will do the right >> thing: >> >> dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/da0 bs=1m >> >> > OK, I understand that 10000000 isn't good, I just thought it wouldn't > harm. But if it is a transfer rate killer then I'd better think of > typing ^C now. The command is running for 6 hours now. > > An idea how I can check the current amount of transfered byed > alongside the running dd command? Or watch the current i/o rate? Ack, I mean "bytes" :)