From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jun 7 14:24:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gate.volant.org (gate.volant.org [207.111.218.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EFC937B405 for ; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 216-55-134-176.dsl.san-diego.abac.net ([216.55.134.176] helo=[192.168.0.13]) by gate.volant.org with asmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 17GRDt-0008QE-00; Fri, 07 Jun 2002 14:24:41 -0700 Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 14:24:38 -0700 From: Pat Lashley To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch problems in OpenOffice1.0.0 port Message-ID: <408200000.1023485078@mccaffrey.phoenix.volant.org> In-Reply-To: <20020607225214.G7840-100000@small.pukruppa.de> References: <20020607225214.G7840-100000@small.pukruppa.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.2.1 (Linux/x86 Demo) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========1255600887==========" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --==========1255600887========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Friday, June 07, 2002 10:57:39 PM +0000 Peter Ulrich Kruppa=20 wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Pat Lashley wrote: > >> I have no idea which way to answer this; and the build is long enough >> that I'm disinclined to experiment... > > Why? We are running a multitasking OS. Well, partly because of the likelyhood that at this point even if I chose the right answer to the patch questions I might still wind up with an unusable result. This is not my first attempt to build the port since the BROKEN was removed. Before installing gcc 3.1 I was able to finish the build; but with the setup.bin coredump that someone else reported earlier. Actually, I -did- try assuming that the patches were already installed and answering 'n' to the questions; but then the build died fairly soon after. I considered going with the assumption that the patches were reversed; but I have trouble believing that reversed patches would have made it into the distribution tarball. Or that I would be the first to notice if they had... > I am building the OO port from June 7'th 17.52 and it works for > about 4 hours now. And you can do anything else with your machine > in the meantime. My previous builds took about 13 hours. (Some of that is due to the fact that the only disk I have with enough permanent space available for the installation is a slow USB disk.) Sure, I could just let it run; but at the moment I suspect that it would be a waste of time and resources. I'd much rather have someone familiar with the OOo build on FreeBSD make specific suggestions, or ask specific questions that might point to the root of the problem. -Pat --==========1255600887========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9ASSXncYNbLD8wuMRAgbBAJ421a/iFgUGTDyJm1MXEXGnpkwZUQCgoN/8 jqyQnoG1OxmhbXp+ncV6HVM= =lZw3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========1255600887==========-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message