Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:40:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/41710: [port] lame update (fix CFLAGS) Message-ID: <200208161640.g7GGe3Dh028390@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/41710; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>
To: Alexander@Leidinger.net
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ports/41710: [port] lame update (fix CFLAGS)
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:00:40 +0200 (CEST)
In article <200208161440.g7GEe5ne009408@freefall.freebsd.org> you write:
> There's no need to remove "OPTIMIZATION": as long as nobody uses
> "--enable-expopt={yes,full}" for configure, it doesn't get used.
Wrong. Further down in configure, there's an assignment
CFLAGS="${OPTIMIZATION} ${CFLAGS}". This isn't worth arguing about,
just go and test it yourself.
> What's wrong with adding "-Wall -pipe" to CFLAGS?
*I* want to decide if I build with "-pipe" or without. And if I
want to, then what's the point of "-pipe -pipe"? "-Wall" doesn't
add anything outside development.
Basically these happened to be nearby, so I removed them along with
the other cruft that killed the compile on -CURRENT/alpha.
--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200208161640.g7GGe3Dh028390>