From owner-cvs-all Sun Feb 10 17:56:45 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3650237B400; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:56:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7353D5; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:56:35 -0600 (CST) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.cc (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1B1uZU65384; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:56:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar) Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:56:35 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Cy Schubert , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5-beta [...] Message-ID: <20020211015635.GB65324@madman.nectar.cc> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Cy Schubert , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <200202102245.g1AMjX622948@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020210234709.GN82640@squall.waterspout.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020210234709.GN82640@squall.waterspout.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/ Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 06:47:09PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 02:45:33PM -0800, Cy Schubert wrote: > > Added files: > > security/krb5-beta/files README.FreeBSD patch-ac patch-ad > > patch-ae patch-af patch-ai patch-aj > > patch-appl::telnet::telnetd::telnetd.8 > > patch-appl::bsd::Makefile.in > > patch-appl::bsd::klogind.M patch-as > > patch-at patch-av > > patch-appl::telnet::telnetd::Makefile.in > > patch-appl::telnet::telnetd::utility.c > > patch-ax patch-ay patch-ba patch-bb > > security/krb5-beta Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr > > pkg-plist > > Log: > > New port, Kerberos V 1.2.4-beta1. > > This should have been repocopied from ports/security/krb5. No, it should not. I requested no repocopy for this port. > This > commit causes the krb5-beta port to lose about 3 1/2 years of > history. The krb5-beta port has no history [1]. This is a scratch port for people who want to beta test the next version of MIT Kerberos before it is released. When it is released, ports/security/krb5 will be updated as appropriate and this port will be removed again. By contrast, a port called `krb5-devel' would be something different (such as a development branch from CVS) and _would_ require a repocopy. Maybe this is what you have in mind. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se [1] In two senses: (1) We don't really want/need the history beyond the current beta cycle. (2) The port reorganization cleaned out the attics, so we don't have the revisions for the previous krb5-beta incarnations anyway. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message