From owner-freebsd-audit Tue Oct 24 5:59:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-audit@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E913B37B4CF for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 05:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e9OCxhn86371; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 06:59:44 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id GAA15161; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 06:59:43 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200010241259.GAA15161@harmony.village.org> To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Subject: Re: printjob.c mktemp() problem Cc: audit@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Oct 2000 14:05:10 +0200." <20001024140510.G93799@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20001024140510.G93799@lucifer.bart.nl> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 06:59:43 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-audit@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20001024140510.G93799@lucifer.bart.nl> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven writes: : Am I right into thinking this might be a good candidate for a : mktemp()->mkstemp() conversion? Yes. Almost all of the uses of mktemp in the tree are good candidates for conversion. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message