Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 16:01:28 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 123411] [PATCH] mail/postfix-policyd-weight - rc.d startup script does not correctly show status because "name" is set incorrectly. Message-ID: <bug-123411-13-5S73JbIvA9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-123411-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-123411-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D123411 Dan McGrath <danmcgrath.ca@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |danmcgrath.ca@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Dan McGrath <danmcgrath.ca@gmail.com> --- Hi, I think this bug is still a problem, at least in 2017Q3 branch that I am us= ing. Namely it breaks the saltstack "enable" service due to the way it does the lookup and checks the name and compares to the rc.d script name. I am not exactly who is at fault here as it might be more of a problem with salt and the logic is uses. In the end, I use a state with: mail/postfix-policyd-weight: pkg: - installed service: - name: policyd-weight - running - enable: True Salt is able to start this service, but it never modifies the rc.conf and it doesn't understand the convention used, thus it would fail a restart of the host/jail this state is applied to unless a salt highstate is run to correct the issue. While I can work around this with salt by manually editing the rc.conf, I wonder if this bug needs to be revisited? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-123411-13-5S73JbIvA9>