From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 12:56:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77F416A403 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@pop.isdefe.es) Received: from mail3.isdefe.es (mail3.isdefe.es [62.93.171.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8852313C455 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@pop.isdefe.es) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [194.15.213.238]) by mail3.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1FA564AE; Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:56:56 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47C01818.2090704@pop.isdefe.es> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:56:56 +0100 From: Raul User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pyunyh@gmail.com References: <20080221035014.GB26427@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080221050635.GC26427@cdnetworks.co.kr> <47BDBB1A.9040701@andric.com> <47BE2FEF.7010709@andric.com> <20080222041715.GA30497@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080222054103.GD30497@cdnetworks.co.kr> <47BF6455.2020603@pop.isdefe.es> <20080223023142.GA35336@cdnetworks.co.kr> In-Reply-To: <20080223023142.GA35336@cdnetworks.co.kr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Packet corruption in re0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:56:57 -0000 Pyun YongHyeon escribió: [....] > > >Download if_re.c and if_rlreg.h in the following URL and rebuild the > > >driver. > > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_re.c > > >http://people.freebsd.org/~yongari/re/7.0R/if_rlreg.h > > > > I've tested it against my 'netcat | tar' and it improves as it takes > > four iterations (instead of one) to fall down (nearly unusable). I've > > not run it so many times in a row on CURRENT. Must I try it again?. > > That's what pciconf says about my re0: > > > > re0@pci0:2:15:0: class=0x020000 card=0xe0001458 chip=0x816710ec > > rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 > > > > How about disabling checksum offload on re0 side? After 6 iterations everything looked good so I started to do other things while the netcat was running (build ports). Shortly after (seconds), the problems appear again. Now, I'm not sure how reliable the testing procedure is and there are other issues with the chipset (AMD 690G), usb support problems, the sata subsystem is not well recognized ... I've seen also problems on this box while using em0 so too complex environment to isolate the possible re0 problem. While I'll be glad to test whatever you ask me for, too loose ends on this box nowadays. Regards, Raul