Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:54:32 +0000
From:      Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
Cc:        svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, William Grzybowski <wg@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r321141 - head/devel/glog
Message-ID:  <20130718135432.GA37227@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1306181849380.1789@trevally.site>
References:  <201306171644.r5HGiqSr058369@svn.freebsd.org> <20130618033635.GC57172@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1306181849380.1789@trevally.site>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 07:34:07AM -0600, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> >> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ LIB_DEPENDS=	execinfo:${PORTSDIR}/devel/
> >>  GNU_CONFIGURE=	yes
> >>  USES=	pathfix
> >>  USE_LDCONFIG=	yes
> >> -USE_GCC=	4.2+
> > 
> > If I memory serves me right, it should be USE_GCC=any in this case, but 
> > maybe gerald@ would correct me.
> 
> Assuming this change removed the dependency on GCC (that is, the
> ports compiles with both base clang and base GCC) this looks right.

Ah, yes, I somewhat read ^- as ^+ (i.e. thought that line was added, not
removed), sorry.

> USE_GCC=any was step 1 of a longer plan linimon@ was driving, in
> discussion with portmgr and me, but this has now stalled.  I'll
> try to find time to push this a bit farther...

Interesting; please tell us the summary at the end of the discussions as
I'm always interested in USE_GCC logic.  Ideally, it should allow to select
from 1) system GCC (4.2) on Clang-default versions of FreeBSD, and 2) nice,
stable, non-volatile, LTS, whatever, GCC version that does not have to be
rebuilt every few weeks, when system compiler (either GCC 4.2 or Clang) is
not sufficient.

./danfe



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130718135432.GA37227>