From owner-freebsd-questions  Sun Mar 30 15:14:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA19699
          for questions-outgoing; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 15:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stepahead.net (stepahead.net [205.161.119.233])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19686
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 15:14:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (irq@localhost)
          by stepahead.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id SAA12805; Sun, 30 Mar 1997 18:14:08 -0500
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 1997 18:14:06 -0500 (EST)
From: interrupt request <irq@stepahead.net>
To: "Randy A. Katz" <randyk@ccsales.com>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.1.7 installation errors
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970330150437.00940be0@ccsales.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.970330181352.12590B-100000@stepahead.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Yea, but was that a new install from the CD?


===================================================
interrupt request <irq@stepahead.net>
The Collective
www.collective.org
"We make the things that make communications free"

On Sun, 30 Mar 1997, Randy A. Katz wrote:

> Nope, it works fine.
> 
> At least on a dx4/100, pentium 75 & pentium 166 & Pentium Pro 180, all with
> 32mb ram except the 166 & 180 they have 64mb, scsi hard drives & ide hard
> drives (some have adaptec 2940 and the other just ide). IDE cdroms and scsi
> cdroms... Works fine fine fine.
> 
> 
> At 05:40 PM 3/30/97 -0500, you wrote:
> >These installation problems are really starting to scare me.. I just
> >ordered this..is the cdrom.com dist of 2.1.7 officialy messed up?
> >
> >
> >===================================================
> >interrupt request <irq@stepahead.net>
> >The Collective
> >www.collective.org
> >"We make the things that make communications free"
> >
> >
>