From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 14:35:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B117D905 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 14:35:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from astart2.astart.com (108-248-95-193.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net [108.248.95.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65D982A12 for ; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 14:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop_84.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by astart2.astart.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s78EZEcr031423; Fri, 8 Aug 2014 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from papowell@astart.com) Message-ID: <53E4E024.6070003@astart.com> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 07:35:16 -0700 From: Patrick Powell Reply-To: papowell@astart.com Organization: Astart Technologies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130714 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jie Gao Subject: Re: Apache 24 + mod_perl References: <53DC01F2.90102@astart.com> <20140801213432.GC2644@home.opsec.eu> <53DE5457.90007@gmx.de> <53DEA5F8.40204@astart.com> <53E293EE.60100@astart.com> <53E29F63.4020507@gmx.de> <53E2C7E3.1060009@astart.com> <20140807024325.GA8130@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20140807024325.GA8130@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: olli hauer , ports@freebsd.org, Kurt Jaeger , Steve Hay , "modperl@perl.apache.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 14:35:25 -0000 Hmmm... well, it looks like you need to update the procedures from RedHat which build the mod_perl. I don't think you can build a FreeBSD port on a Linux system, although stranger things have happened. On 08/06/14 19:43, Jie Gao wrote: > The patch, or rather the patching itself, does not work with a box of > Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5 for me here. > > Regards, > > Jie > > * Patrick Powell wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 17:27:15 -0700 >> From: Patrick Powell >> To: olli hauer >> CC: Steve Hay , Kurt Jaeger , >> ports@freebsd.org, "modperl@perl.apache.org" >> Subject: Re: Apache 24 + mod_perl >> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130714 >> Thunderbird/17.0.7 >> >> On 08/06/14 14:34, olli hauer wrote: >>> On 2014-08-06 22:45, Patrick Powell wrote: >>>> On 08/06/14 00:19, Steve Hay wrote: >>>>> On 3 August 2014 22:13, Patrick Powell wrote: >>>>>> On 08/03/14 08:25, olli hauer wrote: >>>>>>> On 2014-08-01 23:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Question: when will mod_perl be available for Apache 24? >>>>>>>> There's a PR where people are discussing this: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191471 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This PR needs more testers etc. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I've updated the PR with a patch against the latest mod_perl trunk >>>>>>> revision (r1602105). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The patch against the port can be grabbed from here or from our bugzilla >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/mod_perl2-2.0.8_apache24.diff >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please test *at own risk*, and report issues to upstream and here so we >>>>>>> can integrate fresh upstream fixes and update the port. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The first proposed patch will allows the port to build but I have to many >>>>>>> concerns for integrating this simple fix into the tree. >>>>>>> I don't believe the first patch on the PR will work right else it would >>>>>>> take the upstream dev. work and time for mod_perl2 at absurdI -um ... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I have taken a slightly different approach, using the mod_perl2 SVN >>>>>> ..../httpd24 branch as the starting point. >>>>>> >>>>> The httpd24 branch is obselete. It was used for the initial >>>>> development of httpd-2.4 support, but was superseded by >>>>> httpd24threading, and since then everything from both branches has >>>>> been merged back to trunk. >>>>> >>>>> The current trunk is largely ready for a 2.0.9 release supporting >>>>> httpd-2.4, pending some more testing and fixes as necessary. >>>>> >>>> I tried using the trunk a couple of days ago and it did not compile. Just to make sure >>>> that I am using the right SVN respository and branch, what is the URL of the trunk SVN repository? >>>> I am more than happy to try testing mod_perl. >>>> >>> Hm, with the following patch applied to www/mod_perl2 it builds fine for me on FreeBSD 8.4 / 10.0 (amd64) an apache-2.4.10 >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/mod_perl2-2.0.8_apache24.diff >>> >>> The patch does some adjustments in the port / pkg-plist and fetches a complete archive containing all patches so the sources are the same as the upstream (r1602105) trunk/httpd24threade branch. >>> >>> After applying the patch and using the command `make patch' it is easy to compare the sources against upstream sources (check out before) >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/perl/modperl/branches/httpd24threading >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/perl/modperl/trunk >>> >>> >>> Easiest way to apply the patch against the unmodified port: >>> >>> $ cd www/mod_perl2 >>> $ fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~ohauer/diffs/apache/mod_perl2-2.0.8_apache24.diff >>> $ patch -p1 < mod_perl2-2.0.8_apache24.diff >>> >>> PS: >>> I've updated the patch because it needs some additional handling for pkg-plist if build against apache-2.2.x (Provider.pm/Provider.so) >>> >>> >> I tried your procedure (see above). The patch applied, I was able >> to compile the mod_perl, >> and 'make test' ran and it passed all of the critical tests. >> >> I then ran some more of my tests for the functionality it used. >> These passed. >> >> I would say that unless somebody else comes up with a problem that I >> would use this as a baseline >> for distribution/installation. >> >> That is, I would put up the modified Makefile, with a warning, but >> would allow people >> to make/install it by specifying an option such as "make IGNORE_WARNING=yes" >> >> Of course, the FreeBSD Ports team may have different views on >> this... but until the upstream mod_perl team puts out mod_perl-2.0.9 >> officially I think that this is the best we can do. Also, some >> more testers will be able to try it out and report any problems....