From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 14:39:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7121065679 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:39:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndenev@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE028FC1D for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:39:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzs8 with SMTP id zs8so7324648bkb.13 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:39:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=t/UqtLJlKNVs9vf0XdWO+B18IgQj5TVXGxik0LMGVRA=; b=UiqvTF03NgRWM13BrHdO1y8OM/71DkCEyNZ4w7Uui9CtjF3zswwnJLRCbF0GKxUBFS FVSfaGkHZFGmNb0So9jeZ/X0B7Ne3KHug0GBewkS81xrrF16JIV0ubOxkr0ZMOrrUBem +x49mWXrQVY98cCrnUaIs8H653cait3/CH11Y= Received: by 10.204.154.130 with SMTP id o2mr8382313bkw.138.1322318347470; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:39:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from imba-brutale.totalterror.net ([93.152.152.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b2sm2411048fao.1.2011.11.26.06.39.05 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:39:05 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Nikolay Denev In-Reply-To: <0DF73F37-3E46-4F7D-AA6B-B7EB2F2276AB@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:39:03 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20111024175252.GB4663@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <0DF73F37-3E46-4F7D-AA6B-B7EB2F2276AB@gmail.com> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Subject: Re: Possible sge(4)/atphy(4) regression on RELENG_9? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:39:09 -0000 On Oct 24, 2011, at 9:18 PM, Nikolay Denev wrote: >=20 > On Oct 24, 2011, at 8:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: >=20 >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 04:43:57PM +0300, Nikolay Denev wrote: >>> Hello, >>>=20 >>> I've recently upgraded a box running RELENG_8 to RELENG_9 and = immediately I noticed much slower network connection. >>> Running iperf shows about 20-30Mbits which was almost full GigE = (~900Mbits) speed before. >>>=20 >>> I'm noticing interface errors : >>>=20 >>> [16:37]ndenev@nas:~% netstat -I sge0 >>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Idrop = Opkts Oerrs Coll >>> sge0 1500 00:0a:e4:86:62:fa 76114295 42197 0 = 103559806 10324 0 >>> sge0 1500 10.0.0.0 nas 76109575 - - = 119109557 - - >>>=20 >>> Both the switch and the card show 1000 full-duplex. >>> I've tried playing with rxcsum,txcsum,vlanhwtag,tso but disabling = even all of them do not change anything. >>> I've tried different switch port and changed the cable. >>>=20 >>> Here is devinfo for my hardware : >>>=20 >>> sge0 pnpinfo vendor=3D0x1039 device=3D0x0191 subvendor=3D0x103c = subdevice=3D0x2a70 class=3D0x020000 >>> atphy0 pnpinfo oui=3D0xc82e model=3D0x1 rev=3D0x6 at phyno=3D0 >>>=20 >>> Of course all of this can mean hardware problem, I just want to ask = if somebody is seeing something similar, since >>> there are quite a lot minibus related changes as far as I can see. >>>=20 >>> I'll boot RELENG_8 again tomorrow and do a quick test again to = verify that this is not a hardware issue. >>>=20 >>=20 >> I don't have sge(4) controller so it would be better to let us know >> which revision introduced the regression. Just looking over the >> code change didn't reveal the possible cause. >> BTW, I thought sge(4) shall use rgephy(4). Can you also verify >> whether sge(4) in stable/8 also use atphy(4)? >=20 > I've just checked my logs and I can confirm that it was atphy(4) even = in stable/8. >=20 > Sep 26 15:55:19 nas kernel: atphy0: PHY 0 = on miibus0 > Sep 26 15:55:19 nas kernel: atphy0: none, 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, = 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX, 1000baseT-FDX-master, auto >=20 > I'll post more info when I try again stable/8 on this hardware. >=20 > Thanks! >=20 Just for the sake of completeness I'm reporting that the problem turned = out to be not hardware related. The thread "TCP Reassembly Issues" in freebsd-stable list describes the = issue. Thanks.=