From owner-cvs-all Sun Sep 26 20:37:56 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [63.67.141.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF04B15BBF; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 20:37:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from winter@jurai.net) Received: from localhost (winter@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA05559; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 23:37:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 23:37:45 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matthew N. Dodd" To: KATO Takenori Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/i386/conf files.i386 In-Reply-To: <199909270311.UAA44454@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, KATO Takenori wrote: > Modified files: > sys/conf files > sys/i386/conf files.i386 > Log: > Move if_ed.c back to files.i386 since pc98 has a special ed driver. How opposed are the PC98 people to merging sys/pc98/pc98/if_ed.c into sys/dev/ed/if_ed.c? My quick peek at the code indicates all PC98 bits are wrapped with #ifdef PC98/#endif and the driver is otherwise the same as an older version of sys/dev/ed/if_ed.c. I think the plan is to split out the ISA specific bits at some point in the future and the task of merging would be a great deal easier if it was done before the split and not after. -- | Matthew N. Dodd | '78 Datsun 280Z | '75 Volvo 164E | FreeBSD/NetBSD | | winter@jurai.net | 2 x '84 Volvo 245DL | ix86,sparc,pmax | | http://www.jurai.net/~winter | This Space For Rent | ISO8802.5 4ever | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message