From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 31 5:20:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from uucp.nl.uu.net (uucp.nl.uu.net [193.79.237.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5980E37B43E for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2000 05:20:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jaknl by athos.nl.uu.net with UUCP id ; Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:20:15 +0200 Received: from jak.nl ([192.168.0.34]) by jak.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA10970; Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:18:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from johannes@jak.nl) Message-ID: <39AE4B20.68222B60@jak.nl> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2000 14:10:08 +0200 From: Johannes Zwart Organization: JAK++ Software Development B.V. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lex manno Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Why not XEmacs, after all? References: <20000831110629.62334.qmail@web5410.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG lex manno wrote: > Well, > > I was browsing the web with Netscape and I was > experiencing the usual problems. > > Netscape isn't so great after all with all those bugs > that go with it. Like? > XEmacs seems to be a much better web > browser than Netscape. Actually, combining all these > different functions, it seems to be the ultimate > editor. > > I'd like to suggest to Netscape users to have a try on > XEmacs. You'll be pleasently surprised. > > bye, > lex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message