Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2016 12:14:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 211995] Mk/bsd.port.mk: Generic variables present in PLIST_SUB after r420328 Message-ID: <bug-211995-13-QRPG0lD8oj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-211995-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-211995-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211995 Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open URL| |https://reviews.freebsd.org | |/D7580 --- Comment #1 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs@FreeBSD.org> --- I just realised the wrong variable (PLIST_SUB) was used to check the presen= ce of generic variables rather than PLIST_SUB_SED, which was throwing off my tests. Patch (phabricator review) attached fixing two variable references. For lang/python36, the generic variables are no longer present. Custom variables added by the port remain present lang/python36] make -V PLIST_SUB_SED s!3\.6!%%XYDOT%%!g; s!3\.6\.0a4!%%XYZDOT%%!g; s!share/doc/python!%%DOCSDIR%= %!g; s!share/examples/python!%%EXAMPLESDIR%%!g; s!share/python!%%DATADIR%%!g; s!www/python!%%WWWDIR%%!g; s!etc/python!%%ETCDIR%%!g; --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-211995-13-QRPG0lD8oj>