From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Dec 18 05:15:04 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id FAA25478 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 05:15:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id FAA25463 Mon, 18 Dec 1995 05:14:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id FAA11611; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 05:13:01 -0800 To: Tom Samplonius cc: John Dyson , paul@netcraft.co.uk, andreas@knobel.gun.de, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, cracauer@wavehh.hanse.de, jkh@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD-current-stable ??? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Dec 1995 15:27:17 PST." Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 05:13:01 -0800 Message-ID: <11609.819292381@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk We usually do this in "sweeps", where you try to merge in as many "obvious bug fixes" as you can without getting too out of control. I don't think anyone's quite worked up the bottle to do it again for 2.1.1 just yet. :-) Jordan > While this discussion about -current is all very nice, but what I want > to know, is anyone still doing bug-hunting through the -stable tree? > > Tom