Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2002 03:04:58 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>, Dan Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getsetcontext system call Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020209030359.25956A-100000@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <20020207063613.C1C9839F1@overcee.wemm.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > To be quite honest, I think that's the right thing to do for now, until > it is clear what the "right" thing to do is. ptrace(2) isn't going to > survive KSE unscathed, so perhaps we need an enhanced ptrace interface > at some point that doesn't suffer from this kind of interface fragility. Preferably one that doesn't require procfs, given how hard we've been trying to eliminate it :-). Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project robert@fledge.watson.org NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1020209030359.25956A-100000>