From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 1 20:18:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64A316A4CE for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:18:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C97B43FA3 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:18:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 11A5F72DA8; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:18:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3E772DA2; Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:18:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 20:18:16 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: peter.edwards@openet-telecom.com In-Reply-To: <3F6FE9110000103A@mail.openet-telecom.com> Message-ID: <20031101201717.L70057@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <3F6FE9110000103A@mail.openet-telecom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: lockmgr panic on shutdown X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 04:18:16 -0000 On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 peter.edwards@openet-telecom.com wrote: > >> For giggles I'm rolling back vfs_default.c back to 1.87 since its along > >> the backtrace path. > > > >This didn't work so -CURRENT is fully broke. > > > >I'd suggest staying on 10/30 not before 4PM PST if you want to not crash > >on shutdown. > > > > The patch worked for me. (Well, a slightly modified one: I passed 0 for > the thread argument to vget: It recognises that as special). kan came up with a different patch that changes the vput in ffs_vfsops:ffs_sync with a vrele. That should be committed shortly. Since he's been working in that area I'll defer to him :) > > Included here is the patch to both the ffs and default "sync" operations. > I didn't exercise the default one, but the ffs case is certainly behaving > itself. > > > > > -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org