From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 13:10:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3FD37B401 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 13:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464AA43FB1 for ; Sun, 11 May 2003 13:10:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.147.188.198]) by attbi.com (rwcrmhc52) with ESMTP id <2003051120104705200a5lg9e>; Sun, 11 May 2003 20:10:47 +0000 Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.188.198] (may be forged)) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h4BKAluD005191; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:10:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h4BKAkJA005188; Sun, 11 May 2003 16:10:46 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: be-well.ilk.org: lowell set sender to freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org using -f Sender: lowell@be-well.no-ip.com To: Fawaz Ahmad Talal References: <20030511024414.94378.qmail@web13908.mail.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 11 May 2003 16:10:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030511024414.94378.qmail@web13908.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44d6ip2qih.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: afawaz@freebsd.ae Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.0 Installation again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 20:10:49 -0000 Fawaz Ahmad Talal writes: > I thought it is my labtop which causes the problem, so I tried the > same with my desktop, > and it causes the very same thing: a hang during the very first boot > up. At precisely the same point? > I wonder, how could FreeBSD 4.8, and even 3.2, boot up my machine > with No Error > whatsoever, while your fancy new release, freebsd 5.0, the well > developed and most > advanced, aint able to. Maybe there's a *reason* that 5.x is being recommended for "early adopters" rather than production use.