From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Sep 22 22:19:51 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA29146 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 22:19:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nike.efn.org (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.28]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA29114 for ; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 22:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nike.efn.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA01441; Sun, 22 Sep 1996 22:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 Sep 1996 22:19:37 -0700 (PDT) From: John-Mark Gurney X-Sender: gurney_j@nike Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about includes in ports In-Reply-To: <12898.843446111@time.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 22 Sep 1996, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > -I/usr/local/include to the CFLAGS= line... is this the right fix? or > > should the ports be fixed? > > The port is fixed, it's just you who are out of date. ;-) It's already > been discussed here many times that the ports collection follows > -current in preparation for 2.2. thanks I figured that... just making sure :) ttyl.. John-Mark gurney_j@efn.org http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ Modem/FAX: (541) 683-6954 (FreeBSD Box) Live in Peace, destroy Micro$oft, support free software, run FreeBSD (unix)