From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 22 14:26:00 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415621065672
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:26:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7FA8FC20
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:25:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5MEPt86028065;
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5MEPtCv028062; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
In-Reply-To: <201206221240.q5MCeVEF041711@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206221624390.27991@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <201206221240.q5MCeVEF041711@mail.r-bonomi.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 16:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 14:26:00 -0000

> Because it doesn't address an of the *OTHER* valid reasons why GCC is
> being replaced -- among them:
>  1) GCC's continuously increasing propensity to generate "bad code",

examples? All test shows that gcc code is not only bad, but very good. Why 
are you just saying things you know isn't true?


>  2) The inability of GCC mamintainers to fix _long-standing_ bugs, some
>     have been identified for over a decade, and have not been fixed.

That's true. still not that much.

>  3) The continuously increasing trend of introducing 'non standard' features,
No need to use them.