From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Apr 18 22:10:52 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA06257 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 22:10:52 -0700 Received: from chaos.structured.net (chaos.structured.net [204.157.7.10]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA06251 for ; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 22:10:50 -0700 Received: (from kozowski@localhost) by chaos.structured.net (8.6.10/Structured_8.6.10) id WAA17396; Tue, 18 Apr 1995 22:10:35 -0700 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 1995 22:10:35 -0700 From: Eric Kozowski Message-Id: <199504190510.WAA17396@chaos.structured.net> To: fenner@parc.xerox.com, jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com Subject: Re: PPP and dynamic IPs drifting a little Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, karl@mcs.net Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >In message <9504181741.AA05651@borg.ess.harris.com> you write: >>Well, I tried to ping those to confirm they are never in use and >>I got an answer! Then I tried 192.168.1.2 and it answered!! >> >>So what is the scoop on those numbers and RFC1597? > >It looks like structured.net and net99 are advertising 192.168.1.x to the >Internet (well, MAE-EAST, at least), in violation of RFC1597. They should >stop. > Whoops! Taken care of. Thanks for pointing this out. Eric -- Eric Kozowski Structured Network Systems, Inc. kozowski@structured.net Better, Cheaper, Faster -- pick any two. (503)656-3530 Voice "Providing High Quality, Reliable Internet Service" (800)881-0962 Voice 56k to DS3