Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 21:45:44 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating PCI vendors database Message-ID: <4D9A9E78.8040902@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinubeVBu3eCw-q3G9N=M9VpcYcpxQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20110404141016.GL71940@rincewind.paeps.cx> <4D9A0836.7070403@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTimRsadMU-ECstu5Jszt=mG%2Bc3RW2g@mail.gmail.com> <4D9A9AF5.9020807@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTinubeVBu3eCw-q3G9N=M9VpcYcpxQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/04/2011 21:36, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>> 2. Some braindead SCMs may be problematic with this change (p4?*COUGH*). >> > >> > Eh? I don't parse this. > perforce doesn't always grok large changes (especially deletions -- it > gets ditzy). The last change that was committed by someone at $WORK to > this file was several thousand lines long, and that was just additions > IIRC. Thanks for bringing this up, but I don't care. :) The tools serve us, not the other way around. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D9A9E78.8040902>