From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 28 21:40:56 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54FA8106566C for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu@dudu.ro) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D9E8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk38 with SMTP id 38so454158qyk.13 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:40:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.101.17 with SMTP id a17mr24499qco.209.1309297255118; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:40:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.39.210 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:40:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1722A449-718D-4403-A8F4-A3E733CD1518@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <4d705cd0d73fb0d25cc3a017eb2eb072.squirrel@mail.stsnet.ro> <4E0A210F.7050105@sentex.net> <1414962521.20110628215530@nitronet.pl> <1722A449-718D-4403-A8F4-A3E733CD1518@lists.zabbadoz.net> From: Vlad Galu Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:40:15 +0200 Message-ID: To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Pawel Tyll , Adrian Minta , Christian Kratzer , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.2 and MPD5 stability issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:40:56 -0000 On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb < bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > On Jun 28, 2011, at 8:27 PM, Christian Kratzer wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Pawel Tyll wrote: > >> Hi Adrian, > >> > >>> Good news ! > >>> Last night I remove FLOWTABLE option and since then the server is > stable. > >>> No crash what so ever an I was able to increase the number of tunnels. > >> Yeah, FLOWTABLE still needs work, good news on the stability. Could > >> you perhaps drop us all a note in two weeks if things keep stable? > > > > from all I have seen all the work FLOWTABLE needs is finally being > > dropped from the tree. Its a constant cause of trouble and from what > > I recall not even ipv6 capable. > > Well, I'd like to point you at > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=219775 > and as an example at: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/net/route.c?r1=223334&r2=223333&pathrev=223334 > > That said, for some workloads it may be a fairly reasonable option. > Hi Bjoern, Perhaps it would be best to document what those particular workloads are. Apparently, systems with small and seldom changing routing tables are good candidates. However, the distinction is not immediately obvious by skimming through the list archives. Regards, Vlad -- Good, fast & cheap. Pick any two.