From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 4 23:24:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5044D106566C for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 23:24:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail4.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:6000:6::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B1B8FC1C for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 23:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n64NNLml001497 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 4 Jul 2009 16:23:21 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 2D0991CC09; Sat, 4 Jul 2009 16:23:17 -0700 (PDT) To: Aragon Gouveia In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:48:52 +0200." <4A4E6EB4.9000000@phat.za.net> Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 16:23:17 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20090704232317.2D0991CC09@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-07-04_01:2009-07-03, 2009-07-04, 2009-07-03 signatures=0 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Anton Shterenlikht Subject: Re: nice work on ntp.conf! X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:24:08 -0000 > Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2009 22:48:52 +0200 > From: Aragon Gouveia > Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > ntp.conf update from 2009/06/07 is very welcome, > > works great straight out of the box, much better than before! > > > > many thanks to whoever worked on this. > > Agreed, thanks! > > Just wish there were a simple solution to the restriction directives... Really nice, although I feel uncomfortable about the use of LOCAL. It is a great opportunity for foot shooting and, since most systems running NTP are not used as serves, I think that it should be left commented out in the default case. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751