Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 09:52:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: ports/7805: Port bytebench-3.1 is broken! ("shell" part)
Message-ID: <199809020752.JAA13931@kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 7805
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: Port bytebench-3.1 is broken! ("shell" part)
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: high
>Responsible: freebsd-ports
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Wed Sep 2 01:00:00 PDT 1998
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Rudolf Cejka
>Organization:
FEE TU Brno, Czech Republic
>Release: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT i386
>Environment:
I think all.
>Description:
This is serious and high priority, because bytebench results
are going to be published...
Results of the shell part (command "bytebench shell") are shown
much better, than they should be.
Example on my machine: Shell scripts (1 concurrent):
Bytebench installed by hand: 203.3 lpm
Port: 361.0 lpm
Speed difference is due to the inaccessibility of sort.src file
from tst.sh script (tst.sh is called from multi.sh). So some
commands exit very quickly instead of working.
>How-To-Repeat:
Run:
# bytebench shell
After displaying "2" on line 'Shell scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2...'
press Ctrl-C and look in /tmp/times file. It is full of errors:
/usr/local/lib/bytebench/pgms/tst.sh: cannot open sort.src: no such file
This doesn't stop bytebench, but shell results are much better than
they should be!
>Fix:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809020752.JAA13931>