From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon May 15 16:30:09 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA20487
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 15 May 1995 16:30:09 -0700
Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA20477
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 May 1995 16:30:02 -0700
Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <339>; Mon, 15 May 1995 16:44:21 -0700
Date: 	Mon, 15 May 1995 16:43:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Samplonius <tom@haven.uniserve.com>
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Adaptec 2940?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.950515164228.18910A-100000@haven.uniserve.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


  Is it just me, or is the 2940 slower than the 1742 and 2742?

  (BTW, I'm running a kernel supped last week)

Tom