From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Feb 14 12:41:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A84AF1F14E for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:41:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:80:80::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smarthost.sentex.ca", Issuer "smarthost.sentex.ca" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED3BD75215 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (lava.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:5::11]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id w1ECfIFN090020 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:41:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from [192.168.43.26] (saphire3.sentex.ca [192.168.43.26]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w1ECfH6v034624; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:41:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Subject: Re: FreeBSD on AMD Epyc boards To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List References: <8037bf98-acc8-6981-d25b-3b58330dbd33@sentex.net> <20180214081553.GF89804@home.opsec.eu> From: Mike Tancsa Organization: Sentex Communications Message-ID: <03042d50-610f-2614-1495-430f5f88434b@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 07:41:17 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180214081553.GF89804@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 12:41:21 -0000 On 2/14/2018 3:15 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > On the plus side: 16+16 cores, on the minus: A low CPU tact of 2.2 GHz. > Would a box like this be better for a package build host instead of 4+4 cores > with 3.x GHz ? jail server. Lots of processes ---Mike > -- ------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 x203 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada