From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  1 01:00:10 2013
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 980F51C6; Mon,  1 Jul 2013 01:00:10 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 01:00:10 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Felippe de Meirelles Motta <lippe@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r321969 - in head/games/tuxpuck: . files
Message-ID: <20130701010010.GA9325@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201306281815.r5SIFUrh046811@svn.freebsd.org>
 <51CDEADE.4050908@passap.ru>
 <CAJcxwRRRy-6w3_DjkCczi_szPd8qdT7hHidZrqvN2pYNuhOKTw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJcxwRRRy-6w3_DjkCczi_szPd8qdT7hHidZrqvN2pYNuhOKTw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru>, ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 01:00:10 -0000

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:49:19PM -0300, Felippe de Meirelles Motta wrote:
> Hi Boris,
> 
> Just not my custom to tell when it(PORTREVISION) is modified, but I can do
> it from the next time. From now, I'll avoid very short log messages.

As a committer, it's your responsibility to ensure that what's submitted is
actually good enough to be committed.  We should not always trust that it's
100% correct and provide next-to-zero checking.

Naive port revision bumps were extensively discussed in the past on a number
of different lists, including svn-ports-*, ports@, etc.  It would be nice
if we payed more attention to those discussions.

./danfe