From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 26 21:22:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net (pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9867737B417 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:22:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from pool0547.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.194.37] helo=mindspring.com) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16q5t9-0001Yc-00; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:22:23 -0800 Message-ID: <3CA156F5.79580CE3@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 21:21:57 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Andrew , Dan Nelson , Volker Stolz , Ian , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: idprio References: <3CA0D3FE.8113515C@mindspring.com> <20020327092520.V24232-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> <20020326223103.GC93885@elvis.mu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > But if system calls aren't preempted under what circumstances can a > > process hold a vnode lock and then be usurped for processor? > > While sleeping for IO. Ideal systems release and reacquire locks when they are going to suspend for a long time (Djikstra's "Banker's Algorithm"). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message