From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 7 14:36:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B24C016A41F for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: from sigma.octantis.com.au (ns2.octantis.com.au [207.44.189.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6279C13C4BE for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2007 14:36:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@meijome.net) Received: (qmail 13085 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2007 00:36:41 +1000 Received: from 203-217-73-78.dyn.iinet.net.au (HELO localhost) (203.217.73.78) by sigma.octantis.com.au with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 8 Jun 2007 00:36:40 +1000 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 00:36:37 +1000 From: Norberto Meijome To: "Maxim Khitrov" Message-ID: <20070608003637.4595b961@localhost> In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750706061818m4eb25c5ama1c1a91243d7754c@mail.gmail.com> References: <46674717.6020105@calarts.edu> <26ddd1750706061711t660afba9h737735b9e1805c65@mail.gmail.com> <91A69DD3-FDFD-4D66-A2DA-642DEA450FD7@techally.com> <26ddd1750706061818m4eb25c5ama1c1a91243d7754c@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.9.2 (GTK+ 2.10.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtualization of FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 14:36:41 -0000 On Wed, 6 Jun 2007 21:18:16 -0400 "Maxim Khitrov" wrote: > You mean the info in general, or the e1000 part? I never had any > errors in my Windows sys log. However, if you use the default network > adapter you will have problems. I don't remember what the exact error > is, but I remember that when downloading the ports tree, for example, > it will periodically interrupt the transfer. Something about dropped > packets, or something else like that. Never had problems with e1000, > but the network only seems to perform at about 1/2 of what the host OS > can handle. you mean problems with the lnc0 , as seen by FBSD in the VM? interesting, i've never had any problems, but I run VMWare server under Centos 4. I'll give the e1000 a try :) thx for the tip. _________________________ {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome "It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." Charles Darwin. I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been Warned.