From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 15 22:54:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2516E16A55F for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:54:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from chuckr.org (april.chuckr.org [66.92.151.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1D543D45 for ; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:54:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from [66.92.151.44] (may.chuckr.org [66.92.151.44]) by chuckr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51780114AD; Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:37:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4491E525.5080500@chuckr.org> Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:54:29 -0400 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Darwin Power Macintosh; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20060312 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Barniskis References: <448E5692.1070105@chuckr.org> <448EC4A6.50808@scls.lib.wi.us> <4491B189.3020201@chuckr.org> <4491BA82.8070600@scls.lib.wi.us> In-Reply-To: <4491BA82.8070600@scls.lib.wi.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: [Fwd: formatting tools for Docbook] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 22:54:41 -0000 Greg Barniskis wrote: > Chuck Robey wrote: > >> Greg Barniskis wrote: >> You know, I don't want to argue about thread hijacking, I only want my question answered, so i will try again. Has anyone out there used a tool from the ports set, to be able to do general purpose creation and formatting of XML Docbook documents? Please, if you haven't yourself done this (created general purpose Docbook XML documents by the use of FreeBSD ports-supplied tools) then please ignore this. Specifically, this is not intended to reference the FDP tools. It might be possible that the FDP tools supply a 100% 4.5 Docbook XML compatiblity, and if those tools occur in the FreeBSD ports (I think they do) theIN could care about it here, but I don't want o referenc ethe FDP tools at all, otherwise. I don't have any specific intention to use the FDP toolset. Outside of 100% tested compatiblity that you yourself have used in creating and reading non-FreeBSD documents, I really would appreciate not hearing about the FDP tools.