From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jun 24 16:26:59 1996 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA23196 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 16:26:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unix1.ism.com.br (root@unix1.ism.com.br [200.255.211.35]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA23145 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 16:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clpc1.compuland.com.br ([200.255.96.22]) by unix1.ism.com.br (8.7.1/8.7.1) with SMTP id UAA24762; Mon, 24 Jun 1996 20:23:33 -0300 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 1996 20:23:33 -0300 Message-Id: <199606242323.UAA24762@unix1.ism.com.br> X-Sender: compland@ism.com.br X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 1.4.4 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis From: compland@ism.com.br (Helio Coelho Jr. - CompuLand Informatica) Subject: Re: curious ping Cc: questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >#define quoting(Helio Coelho Jr. - CompuLand Informatica) >// Hi: >// >// I have two machines attached to a hub. Both using SMC Etherpower. If I >// ping from machine "A" to machine "B", with the smallest packet size >// (64bytes), I got lots >// of lost packets (about 30-40%). But if I raise it just a little bit >// (108bytes) no >// packet lost! Why this happens ? > > You didn't talk about the traffic load. One of the limiting factors >of network processing is packet processing, meaning that bursts of small >packets demand more CPU to process than large packets. This could be >your problem, if your receiving CPU cannot deal with the suplied small >packets traffic. It happens with or without traffic! Helio.