From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 3 08:45:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E9696F for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4B58FC14 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 08:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id wz12so1806543pbc.13 for ; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:45:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fQWgOX7DdZwDoqREKCwY74U1IQLWsoucyqelS1vWDYw=; b=jbytMLs88QV8Ze0qgG3usozSapQ1VyKMEBt0+9ddGMSVef4wr3NpBSolgR/DT/kGAT j3JQDPrAOIK3cH620Qt0FqFVwbvqaYV75bNxttxLsEOqT3KP7yhaZL5ix7ZjkLhf/BZI /rAC4qv01yug+rzfTpwNwt+GNUqI865qAEQ8yLTDFbRf+cRphn50rt0uJ5CyHbkVllIj Fdj2d77YsBrZiijyLbRbX8cu3vop3GENObzE9k9sU0kNQqMnRnYqPP4d2duQpERSOp96 ShyMH1KOT76bayGVDOV8vDRi6KHRCgeRWdzrAPaxXFUKGnIodA3cTPOpbRkJqI1K4Tis kbqg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.193.167 with SMTP id hp7mr27592119pbc.124.1354524309401; Mon, 03 Dec 2012 00:45:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.240.133 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 00:45:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.240.133 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Dec 2012 00:45:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1354460979.69940.627.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <20121203011242.GA21372@dft-labs.eu> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 02:45:09 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: New jail does not understand nullfs From: Matt Donovan To: Mateusz Guzik Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Ian Lepore , current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2012 08:45:10 -0000 Updated system to r243801 the allow.mount.nullfs still errors out. On Dec 2, 2012 8:15 PM, "Matt Donovan" wrote: > Attached is my jail.conf. according to my logs I am using r243464. Going > to do another svn update and try again as well. > On Dec 2, 2012 7:12 PM, "Mateusz Guzik" wrote: > >> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 08:09:39AM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: >> > On Sun, 2012-12-02 at 01:17 -0600, Matt Donovan wrote: >> > > When attempting to start the jail in question the following happens >> > > >> > > >> > > server# jail -c poudriere >> > > jail: poudriere: unknown parameter: allow.mount.nullfs >> > > >> > > >> > > Below is my jail.conf >> > > >> > > poudriere { >> > > name=poudriere; >> > > host.hostname=poudriere; >> > > ip4.addr="192.168.1.30"; >> > > persist; >> > > children.max=10; >> > > allow.mount; >> > > mount.devfs; >> > > allow.mount.nullfs; >> > > allow.raw_sockets; >> > > allow.socket_af; >> > > allow.sysvipc; >> > > enforce_statfs=1; >> > > path=/newsystem/jail/poudriere; >> > > exec.stop="umount -a"; >> > > } >> > > >> > > Does the switch not work yet? As I am using CURRENT with the latest >> > > revision. >> > > >> > >> > That "mount.devfs" doesn't look right, should that have "allow." on the >> > front? I wonder if that's the problem and the error report is off by >> > one line or something? >> > >> >> mount.devfs means "mount devfs" :) >> >> However, it indeed may be some issue with config parsing, e.g. some >> mishandled whitespace. >> >> Matt, in general this should work just fine. What revision are you using >> to test? Can you attach this config instead of copy-pasting it? >> >> -- >> Mateusz Guzik >> >