From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sat Jul 13 23:43:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE33115D079B for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA3774E27 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3B40D15D0798; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBC315D0797 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FBB774E22 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB50510A60 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6DNh6UP027431 for ; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x6DNh6GO027430 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239156] graphics/ImageMagick6-nox11 pulls in a lot of x11 stuff via graphics/cairo Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: martin@waschbuesch.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239156 --- Comment #2 from Martin Waschb=C3=BCsch --- (In reply to Ting-Wei Lan from comment #1) Thank you for the suggestion. I do know how to work around it when building= the package myself. My point was about expectations: Someone installing a -nox11 package will expect it to do just that. Instea= d, x11 + wayland gets installed. That just seems wrong to me. Also, someone using pkg (official packages, not poudriere) instead of ports does not have much of a choice. Thus, as I see it, there are three options to solve this: 1) Can the -nox11 ImageMagick packages as they pull in x11 stuff anyway. Th= at way at least no false expectations are raised. 2) Disable OPENGL, X11 and XCB per default for graphics/cairo since they re= sult in these dependencies. However, hoping that these options are set by default for a reason, that might break other packages depending on graphics/cairo providing these features. 3) Create a graphics/cairo-nox11 port with appropriate options unset so that the -nox11 ImageMagick packages can depend on that instead of graphics/cair= o. That way other packages are left untouched while being able to provide -nox= 11 ImageMagic packages that actually behave as advertised.=20 My preference would be for 3). One could leave it as is, however I tend to finding that unacceptable seein= g as you do not get what you expected when installing one of the -nox11 ImageMag= ic packages. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=