Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2000 13:51:28 -0500 From: Will Andrews <andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM> To: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: andrews@TECHNOLOGIST.COM, torstenb@vmunix.org, billf@chc-chimes.com, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@FreeBSD.ORG, andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu Subject: Re: zsh re-org Message-ID: <20000212135128.C11463@shadow.blackdawn.com> In-Reply-To: <20000212183304.LEZE895.t-mta3.odn.ne.jp@athena.shige.org>; from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG on Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 03:33:01AM %2B0900 References: <20000212121956.B11463@shadow.blackdawn.com> <20000212183304.LEZE895.t-mta3.odn.ne.jp@athena.shige.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 13, 2000 at 03:33:01AM +0900, owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG wrote: > May I maintain shells/zsh too? :) > > >From zsh community, stable-release is 3.0.x. > In this sence, I think we should follow this. > But we, FreeBSD users, can still select zsh-devel packages/ports > instead of shells/zsh. > It is an enough support, I think. I would have no problem whatsoever if you took over maintainership and the ports be left alone. I understand people's wish to have a stable zsh, but I will not tolerate incompetent maintainers. I know you'll do the job the way it's supposed to be done. Bill, if possible, just change maintainer so shige can do the job.. I will not object to keeping both ports if they are both maintained in a reasonable manner. :) -- Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000212135128.C11463>