Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 15:56:07 -0800 From: Michael Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org Cc: Frode Nordahl <frode@nordahl.net>, Hiten Pandya <hiten@angelica.unixdaemons.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 1931] Re: acpid implementation? Message-ID: <D062BB22-F43E-11D6-83BB-0050E4660701@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <3DCCFB94.C964C09D@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, November 9, 2002, at 04:12 AM, Terry Lambert wrote: > Repeat: #1 is power profiles I don't see why this requires an 'acpid'. You want a control tool, sure, but power policy is not something that needs a daemon. > o replacing devices in a multipurpose bay, which may take one > of a number of devices, including a battery Does not require (and could not practically be assisted by) a daemon. > o port replicators with devices in them Does not require (and could not practically be assisted by) a daemon. > o Docking adaptors Does not require (and could not practically be assisted by) a daemon. > o Forced hibernate and/or shutdown, pending an empty battery Does not require a daemon. > o Software implementation of features (e.g. selective powerdown > or operational level, based on idle time, user preferences, > or other things not settable by "sysctl" In other words, "misc stuff". Still nothing concrete. = Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D062BB22-F43E-11D6-83BB-0050E4660701>